<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Home of the Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kevinscobee.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kevinscobee.com</link>
	<description>Finding my fastball...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:10:31 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Terrors of Progressivism And Why the Constitution Is Overrated by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=138#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=138#comment-501</guid>
		<description>&quot;Progressives seek to subvert the US Constitution by “changing” it in an arbitrary and unconstitutional manner.&quot;

Well it&#039;s a good thing the U.S. doesn&#039;t allow Blacks, Latinos, Jews, Muslims, and Women the right to vote. Phew. We&#039;re so lucky we don&#039;t have to listen to the voices of those that aren&#039;t male, white, and over the age of 18.

Oh wait.

Well it&#039;s a good thing we can drink as much as we want. Alcohol tastes good and I enjoy a couple frosty mugs now and again.

Oh wait, we can&#039;t drink alcohol.

Well this sucks. We can&#039;t drink alcohol and now my buddy&#039;s parents are running liquor through the underground tunnels beneath their speak-easy. Sure would make things a lot easier if we didn&#039;t have that whole 18th Amendment garbage to worry about.

Oh wait, we don&#039;t, because of the 21st Amendment. It&#039;s funny how the Founding Fathers - which are spoke of in such lore and admiration for their brilliance and foresight for building a &quot;more perfect union,&quot; even though most, if not all, owned slaves, slept with numerous amounts of women, and were the very ones that considered Blacks 3/5 of an American - put in these certain tricky things like &quot;amendments&quot; so the Constitution, in all of its glory, could, you know, be AMENDED to fit the &quot;progress&quot; of society. The Founding Fathers were themselves, progressives. 

There is a man, a probably really dumb man, named Winston Churchill that said &quot;democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.&quot; Democracy is a nice idea. But it is still an incredibly flawed system, it just happens to be less flawed than the others. 

&quot;Why? Because these proponents are socialist/Marxist/communist themselves.&quot;

Wow, you must be using your jump-to-conclusions mat on your slippery slope. Again, the Founding Fathers, that were heralded for their brilliance, were in fact progressives. They saw the need for change, so that made change. And they put in  avenues for change in the Constitution so society could evolve as the changing times dictated. 

Progressives don&#039;t seek to elevate anything at the expense of the individual. They look to evolve to make things better for society, for people. It&#039;s those that are stuck in the status quo, that refuse to accept or force change when change is needed, that are holding back American. 

Progressives are not socialist/communist/marxist, etc. They&#039;re just not. Buzzwords like that do more to hold back society by trying to invoke fear of debate, of a discussion. Which basically means the Progressives win. It only makes &quot;them&quot; stronger. That&#039;s exactly the reason they&#039;re trying to evolve.

After saying all of that, I have a confession. I&#039;m a Republican, voted Republican my whole life.

Thanks for being a part of the discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Progressives seek to subvert the US Constitution by “changing” it in an arbitrary and unconstitutional manner.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well it&#8217;s a good thing the U.S. doesn&#8217;t allow Blacks, Latinos, Jews, Muslims, and Women the right to vote. Phew. We&#8217;re so lucky we don&#8217;t have to listen to the voices of those that aren&#8217;t male, white, and over the age of 18.</p>
<p>Oh wait.</p>
<p>Well it&#8217;s a good thing we can drink as much as we want. Alcohol tastes good and I enjoy a couple frosty mugs now and again.</p>
<p>Oh wait, we can&#8217;t drink alcohol.</p>
<p>Well this sucks. We can&#8217;t drink alcohol and now my buddy&#8217;s parents are running liquor through the underground tunnels beneath their speak-easy. Sure would make things a lot easier if we didn&#8217;t have that whole 18th Amendment garbage to worry about.</p>
<p>Oh wait, we don&#8217;t, because of the 21st Amendment. It&#8217;s funny how the Founding Fathers &#8211; which are spoke of in such lore and admiration for their brilliance and foresight for building a &#8220;more perfect union,&#8221; even though most, if not all, owned slaves, slept with numerous amounts of women, and were the very ones that considered Blacks 3/5 of an American &#8211; put in these certain tricky things like &#8220;amendments&#8221; so the Constitution, in all of its glory, could, you know, be AMENDED to fit the &#8220;progress&#8221; of society. The Founding Fathers were themselves, progressives. </p>
<p>There is a man, a probably really dumb man, named Winston Churchill that said &#8220;democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.&#8221; Democracy is a nice idea. But it is still an incredibly flawed system, it just happens to be less flawed than the others. </p>
<p>&#8220;Why? Because these proponents are socialist/Marxist/communist themselves.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow, you must be using your jump-to-conclusions mat on your slippery slope. Again, the Founding Fathers, that were heralded for their brilliance, were in fact progressives. They saw the need for change, so that made change. And they put in  avenues for change in the Constitution so society could evolve as the changing times dictated. </p>
<p>Progressives don&#8217;t seek to elevate anything at the expense of the individual. They look to evolve to make things better for society, for people. It&#8217;s those that are stuck in the status quo, that refuse to accept or force change when change is needed, that are holding back American. </p>
<p>Progressives are not socialist/communist/marxist, etc. They&#8217;re just not. Buzzwords like that do more to hold back society by trying to invoke fear of debate, of a discussion. Which basically means the Progressives win. It only makes &#8220;them&#8221; stronger. That&#8217;s exactly the reason they&#8217;re trying to evolve.</p>
<p>After saying all of that, I have a confession. I&#8217;m a Republican, voted Republican my whole life.</p>
<p>Thanks for being a part of the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Terrors of Progressivism And Why the Constitution Is Overrated by joshua0853</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=138#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>joshua0853</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=138#comment-500</guid>
		<description>The problem with &quot;progressivism&quot; is that its proponents are anti-American and anti-Constitution. As such, they embark on paths that totally disregard the authority and relevancy of the US Constitution in their efforts to transform the nation into some sort of socialist/Marxist/communist hybrid unlike any in the history of mankind. Why? Because these proponents are socialist/Marxist/communist themselves. 

The US Constitution was established as a system of checks and balances to ensure the sovereignty of the individual while limiting the power of government. Progressives seek to reverse this by elevating the &quot;state&quot; at the expense of the individual.

Changing the Constitution by the amendment process is fine. Progressives seek to subvert the US Constitution by &quot;changing&quot; it in an arbitrary and unconstitutional manner.  This, I have a problem with. 

What these people fail to understand is that America is great precisely because of its system of government which puts the people at the center of it all by protecting the rights of the people AGAINST tyranny by the rule of law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with &#8220;progressivism&#8221; is that its proponents are anti-American and anti-Constitution. As such, they embark on paths that totally disregard the authority and relevancy of the US Constitution in their efforts to transform the nation into some sort of socialist/Marxist/communist hybrid unlike any in the history of mankind. Why? Because these proponents are socialist/Marxist/communist themselves. </p>
<p>The US Constitution was established as a system of checks and balances to ensure the sovereignty of the individual while limiting the power of government. Progressives seek to reverse this by elevating the &#8220;state&#8221; at the expense of the individual.</p>
<p>Changing the Constitution by the amendment process is fine. Progressives seek to subvert the US Constitution by &#8220;changing&#8221; it in an arbitrary and unconstitutional manner.  This, I have a problem with. </p>
<p>What these people fail to understand is that America is great precisely because of its system of government which puts the people at the center of it all by protecting the rights of the people AGAINST tyranny by the rule of law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We All Make Mistakes—This Isn’t A Mistake by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=142#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=142#comment-499</guid>
		<description>True, and he should have been immediately fired. My love and admiration for an employee (because that&#039;s what he is) only goes so far especially when you consider the horrible lack of judgment his choice shows. That&#039;s not the kind of person that needs to be in a leadership position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, and he should have been immediately fired. My love and admiration for an employee (because that&#8217;s what he is) only goes so far especially when you consider the horrible lack of judgment his choice shows. That&#8217;s not the kind of person that needs to be in a leadership position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We All Make Mistakes—This Isn’t A Mistake by JMcElwee24</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=142#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>JMcElwee24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=142#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Washington shouldn&#039;t be given any credit.  He only came out with his cocaine use once he found out MLB was going to drug test.  He came out once a consequence came into the picture.  There is nothing admirable about that in my opinion.  He should&#039;ve said something the morning, day, hour after he dipped into the powder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington shouldn&#8217;t be given any credit.  He only came out with his cocaine use once he found out MLB was going to drug test.  He came out once a consequence came into the picture.  There is nothing admirable about that in my opinion.  He should&#8217;ve said something the morning, day, hour after he dipped into the powder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;Right Way&#8221; and How You Don&#8217;t Get It: Part 1 by Mike Neal</title>
		<link>http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=43#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kevinscobee.com/?p=43#comment-494</guid>
		<description>Assuming how &quot;Part 1&quot; is in the tittle, I am patiently waiting for &quot;Part 2.&quot;  Should you need any help with continuing this subject, I would be more than happy to assist.  How about the youth coach who sends all of his players to a professional coach/ private instructor for training, and then teaches a different belief set at practice?  Why would a coach knowingly subject his players to two different messages, one from the professional coaches, and one from himself, who is still teaching the things he was taught 15+ years ago?  But what worked/works for this coach in his weekend warrior adult league, should work for the kids.  But what the professional coaches, who played and succeed at a higher level than most athletes ever get to, is not good enough for him.  Needless to say, the conversation at work tonight will be enjoyable and enlightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assuming how &#8220;Part 1&#8243; is in the tittle, I am patiently waiting for &#8220;Part 2.&#8221;  Should you need any help with continuing this subject, I would be more than happy to assist.  How about the youth coach who sends all of his players to a professional coach/ private instructor for training, and then teaches a different belief set at practice?  Why would a coach knowingly subject his players to two different messages, one from the professional coaches, and one from himself, who is still teaching the things he was taught 15+ years ago?  But what worked/works for this coach in his weekend warrior adult league, should work for the kids.  But what the professional coaches, who played and succeed at a higher level than most athletes ever get to, is not good enough for him.  Needless to say, the conversation at work tonight will be enjoyable and enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
